线程： ESP，驱动程序 enjoymenet 或光秃的必要性的祸根？

ESP 系统据说，拯救成千上万的生命，多年来，但是他们变得太具侵入性吗?没有人在他们的头脑会使一例 ESP 去除所有的汽车，直到永远，阿门。但我在过去一周与 ESP 系统，神经质的侵入他们几乎毁了处理的电动机驱动两辆车问题。
第一个是 Aventador 敞篷跑车，第二个是新阿斯顿 · 马汀。
所以 Id 放到集体的问题是: 为什么喜欢阿斯顿马丁和兰博基尼费心设立他们的汽车，以及如果当推来推去，你不能告诉不管怎么说，因为他们 ESP 系统不会让你找出他们做处理?
采取的兰博基尼。我开车这佛罗里达州路上和在附近在家园-迈阿密赛道内场的轨道上。Corsa 模式特别是其 ESP 系统将会踢，在一些油门中角的轻微暗示力量杀人。所以我关掉系统，给了它全油门中期弯在第二个齿轮角和。.突然它处理精美。尼斯和中性，失去抓地力开始触摸却没有哦-我-看在上帝的尾巴出滑稽你期望，按未必须按下的按钮 (在兰博基尼的坚持下，不是我)。
汽车底盘和处理来活着，基本上。甚至其变速箱似乎向上移更加顺利，因为不再它干扰的点燃可怜的 ESP 的传感器。然而，在没有时间做这车感觉前卫或危险，或可能要上路向后飞，只是因为 Id 关掉系统。
所以我问兰博基尼底盘工程师 (将保持无名) 之一，为什么他的汽车 ESP 系统是一样敏感，因为它是，他回答说: 因为不是所有我们的客户可以正确的驱动器。其中，相当一部分一部分实际上，真的没有一点线索......
阿斯顿 · 马丁否则优秀挫越勇患有类似形式的电子绞杀 — — 直到你关闭其 DSC 和按运动按钮，允许的纯度和平衡的机箱，可爆发出汽车，就像一条巨龙飞从其幼虫新兴。而且，多像兰博，它并不让人感觉可怕到驱动器与系统脱离，要么。除非你对你的油门投入公然笨拙，它只是感觉到驱动器更好。无处不在。
请所以，体育和世界的超级跑车制造商，请是不是你允许更多的戏剧展开之前您的 ESP 系统干预，杀死你辛辛苦苦的汽车，使完美的处理时间。如果你想知道如何，好好看看保时捷的方式与他们的 ESP 系统设置其汽车采取参与 — — 因为对我来说，他们做它的方式是最好不过了。
而即使我错了，你可以潜在地提高在零件的额外收入会粗暴值得考虑在某一阶段......

ESP systems are said to have saved thousands of lives over the years, but are they becoming too intrusive? No one in their right mind would make a case for removing ESP from all cars, forever, amen. But Ive driven two cars in the past week with ESP systems that were so neurotically intrusive that they pretty much ruined the handling of the motors in question.
The first was the Aventador Roadster, the second was the new Aston Martin Vanquish.
So the question Id put to the collective is: why do the likes of Aston and Lamborghini bother to set their cars up to handle as well as they do if, when push comes to shove, you wont be able to tell anyway because their ESP systems wont let you find out?
Take the Lamborghini. I drove this on the roads of Florida and on the track around the infield at the Homestead-Miami Speedway. In Corsa mode particularly its ESP system would kick in and kill the power at the merest hint of some throttle mid-corner. So I switched the system off, gave it full throttle mid-bend in a second gear corner and. . . Suddenly it handled beautifully. Nice and neutral, with a touch of understeer to begin with but none of the oh-my-gawd tail-out antics youd expect, having pressed the button that must not be pressed (at Lamborghinis insistence, not mine).
The cars chassis and handling came alive, basically. Even its gearbox seemed to up-shift more smoothly, because no longer was it being interfered with by the sensors that ignite the wretched ESP. And yet at no time did the car feel edgy or dangerous, or likely to fly off the road backwards, just because Id switched the system off.
So I asked one of Lamborghinis chassis engineers (who will remain nameless) why his cars ESP system is as over-sensitive as it is, to which he replied: Because not all of our customers can drive properly. Some of them, quite a few of them actually, dont really have much of a clue…
Aston Martin's otherwise excellent Vanquish suffers from a similar form of electronic strangulation – until you turn its DSC off and press the Sport button, which allows the purity and balance of the chassis to erupt out of the car like a dragon fly emerging from its larva. And, much like the Lambo, it doesnt feel scary to drive with the system off, either. Unless you are overtly clumsy with your throttle inputs, it just feels better to drive. Everywhere.
So please, sports and supercar makers of the world, isnt it time you allowed a bit more drama to unfold before your ESP systems intervene, killing the handling of the cars youve worked so hard to make perfect. And if you want to know how, take a good look at the way Porsche sets its cars up with their ESP systems engaged – because, for me, the way they do it is just about perfect.
And even if Im wrong, the extra revenue you could potentially raise in replacement parts would surly be worth considering at some stage…