In the beginning of the year on the orders of Vladimir Putin established the expert group, which was tasked to prepare proposals for the government related to the resolution of strategic issues. Opportunities for the development of transport systems studied so-called expert group No. 19 under the supervision of the supervisor of the Institute of transport and road facilities of Michael Blinking. Recommendations it was sent to the government. And on the days of the panel's conclusions were presented to the Public Council under the Federal road Agency (Rosavtodor") of the Ministry of transport of the Russian Federation.
It would be as bad as it was, but before the members of the OS at Avtodor, Mikhail Blinkin gave the following explanations and comments. Expert group No. 19 was led by the Scientific Director of the Research Institute of Transport and Roads Mikhail Blinkin. The rate of motorization of the population, especially in recent years, is outpacing the development of the road network. This, as well as the other known fact, "roads are small, and those bad roads" are illustrated with figures and graphs. The truth is that finance for the road economy is chronically lacking. 2009-2010 A huge piece of planned investment "took away", and they amounted to 2-2.2 percent of GDP (it is necessary to remember, it was the brutal years of the crisis), of which the share of the federal budget is 0.8-0.9%, that is less than half. However, as indicated in the report of expert group No. 19, the same situation will be maintained in 2011-2013. We must understand that the crisis did not come out. The budget deficit will amount to 1.73 trillion rubles ($30.7 bln), or 3% of the GDP. for 2011-2020 This is an even smaller share of the GDP-1,2-1.3 per cent per year. Of which, the roads will continue to be very bad. How much money? A minimum of 845 billion rubles will be needed to repair and maintain roads, as required by the regulations. The total income of the Russian energy system in the (at least 1% increase in the road network)-for new construction. In total, the total revenue of the Russian- The GDP of the country is 3.2% of GDP. In fact, it is necessary to take account of the fact that cars are getting more and more (remember at least the sales statistics this year), hence the load on the road network increases by 6-7% per year. Yeah, plus inflation. The calculations were based on the current prices on the asphalt, the chippies, and so on. and prices for some reason have a property to grow. To borrow not from whom if everything is left as it foldally, the rapporteur said that trouble in the road network will be stopped at best, and in the worst case will continue to be chirped, to deteriorate. It seems to be a decision to increase the share of road funds by reducing the share of other budget items. -The language is not going to attack fiscal finance for medicine, the army, the children, the arts ... What a "hole" in the Pension Fund! No, such things are not even supposed to be thought, " said Mikhail Blinkin. And he continued: it is not necessary for investors to come to the inflow of private capital, including foreign investment. Unpopular measures-the most popular is the only way-to collect the necessary money from road users: until 2015. motorists are required to pay increased excise duties included in the price of motor fuel so that all types of roadworks can be covered by this. How much more expensive gasoline and diesel? There's a calculation. The price of each liter of fuel must be 12.47 rubles per liter. Excise. "If we take into account that in the near future the price of fuel will rise by 3 rubles," he said. The dollar rose by 2.48 rubles to 81.95 rubles in the first and second time since August 2014. (The full text of the expert group's studies No. 19 presented for the hearings on the Public Council of Rosavtodor is welcome here.) The experts don't live on the Moon, so the reaction to their proposals was predictable. The most innocuently what they expect to hear from the excise objects-road construction is like a black hole: in it, half of it will be stolen anyway. Another statement is serious: everyone pays a lot of direct and indirect taxes, which have already been reimbursed by roads. The driver-in-charge according to the definition of "A" has not compensated-the drivers of the intermediate report of the expert group: "The owners of the vehicles are sure that they paid off for their use of the roads, buying" expensive "gasoline and paying a" bad " transport tax. Correspondingly, bad roads and systematic congestion are perceived as a direct loss of power. " " In the meantime, the excise tax on gasoline and the transportation tax is a continuation of the quotation, less than 40 percent of the budget spending on roads. Hence, the motorist community is the second largest recipient after pensioners (i.e., the consumer. -Prim.) budget support. " It is recommended that this truth be brought to the mind of the citizens at the helm. And the presenter showed the next slide to the members of the Public Council "Rosavtodor": Breakfast is not allowed? Attending the discussion, the head of the organization of the motorists 'Freedom of Choice', a member of the Public Council under the President of the Russian Federation, Vyacheslav Lysakov, joined the drivers: they paid for their breakfast and even more so. Another increase in the price of gasoline, which is already growing in a rockette, is already beyond good and evil. "Drivers, paying their taxes, have paid their taxes,"-Vyacheslav Lysakov, chairman of the MoE "Freedom of Choice", said other participants of the hearings, and the point is to ease the tax burden on drivers. The participants of the discussion suggested that the government should recommend to the government before advising them to raise fuel prices, increase efficiency, and thus reduce the cost of refining. Increase the output of high-fraction products to the level reached at refineries of Western countries, which should serve as a stabilizer for fuel prices. And if someone should compensate for road construction, first of all, the main road users, namely economic entities. But not the owners of the lightweight. The question of the transport tax has been touched upon: it must be calculated on the basis of not a horse power, but with the vehicle mass in running order ... All this must be of interest to the government, but in the air, the Chairman of the Public Council of the Federal Road Agency, Oleg Skvortsov, continued to hang about the possible price of fuel for nine and a half-how would the government react to it? After all, counselors are respectable people. A summary of the hearings at the "Rosavtodor" is not yet formulated, but on the reaction (and intonation) of specialists, scientists and many experienced practitioners, members of the Public Council of the Federal Agency, one can guess what will be in the document. Head of the Federal Road Agency of the Russian Ministry of Transport Anatoly Chaunin ZR. RU asked the head of "Rosavtodor" Anatoliy Chabunin, who made his own judgments after the report of the expert group. The answer was diplomatic: " One thing is clear: we need to build more good roads. Give me a trillion. One of the questions asked to the rapporteur Mikhail Blinkin: what is the effect of each ruble invested in road construction? Such data were not included in the text of the expert report, and no reply was received. The question is awesome! Every year, vehicles burn about 80 billion litres of fuel to Russia. The current excise rate of 1280 rubles ($27.5) per thousand rubles The drivers of the country are inclined to sign an investment agreement worth a total of 1 trillion rubles. That's the excise duty! But, as in every contract, it should stipulate the responsibilities of the parties. So experts, while preparing a project for the signatory (government), should indicate what is to be spent on the money (length of roads, number of artificial constructions, etc. ). It is also necessary to prescribe which sanctions are imposed on the perpetrator (the State and its representatives) in the case of partial fulfillment of obligations, inefficient expenditure of funds, violation of financial discipline. As such, he would propose a multiple return to investors of the sum of the excises (for example, on cash points of gas stations). And personal responsibility. Investors-investors will probably not agree that the non-radicals should be punished with a simple dismissal from work. This is a very big one. So they should be sentenced to capital punishment ... Bred? Not less than a proposal for a blacksmith to raise the price of gasoline.