Thread: Auto kiusab jalgrattad, jalgrattur kiusab juht, reisijate reageerib vasakule konks

Noh, see on kindlasti huvitav olukord. Kui Audi A7 otsustas tüügas mõned tühja ruumi bike kasti central London ristmik, mõned jalgratturid otsustanud anda see Audi juht otsekohene tagasisidet. Loomulikult olukord hoogustus.

Video on üsna lihtne järgida: jalgratturid saavad nördinud, nad tagaajamine mööda on Audi, nad tegelevad tüüpiline kandepind käitumine. Värk selline juhtub pidevalt linnades ja teie alandlik autor on veidi abashed tunnistada, et kakskümmend aastat või nii ta oli ilmselt vastutav mõnede see ise, Super-klassi BMX võidusõitja, kes ratsutas linnades palju üksi ja koos sõprade sarnaseid knuckleheads. Kui on mitu jalgratturid osalevate, tema kiusamine, tavaline ja lihtne.
Seekord siiski skripti uuesti kui reisija humala välja ka Audi ja õppused rikkuva (või solvunud, sõltuvalt teie vaatenurgast) biker vasakul konksuga. See oluliselt Kummiprofiil summutab nimetatud jalgrattur õige vaimustus ja ta teeb lõpmatuseni paremale punase välja olukorda. Vastavalt selle Daily Mail, Londoni Metropolitan politseiülem märkida, nad on valmis neid uurida, aga nad ei võtnud ühendust kui sõitja.
Tema sel hetkel, et oma kulme tõsta natuke siin. Täpselt milline süüdistus neil meeles? Nad mõtlevad, et nad menetleb sisestamise kasti kuritegu? Omavad seda nüüd. Nad mõtlevad, nad menetleb kui sõitja jaoks ahistavat reisijate ja/või juht? Kindlasti, isegi in lahe Britannia üks on juhtimisõiguse mööda tänavat ilma ähvardav mood on karjusin poolt must-plakeeritud anonüümne bikers. Kahjuks, ma kahtlustan, on tegelik punch mida theyd olema valmis neid uurida. Mis teeb Londoni Metropolitan Police kell hargnemist Kuritöö ja karistus olukorda kui minu neljanda klassi katoliku kooli õpetaja, kes kas tihti karistada mind sest viimistlus olukord hakkas teine õpilane ei paremaks. Ma ei jõudnudki seda kraami kui selili sisse harjumus.
Mul on väga väike probleem pannes süüdistada vastasseis kui sõitja. Jah, Audi juht oli kasti. Ei, ta ei olnud rikkuvate või ähvardades iga bikers. Vastupidi, ta tahtis saada nende ümber ja oma teed. Ta ei tahtnud sõita mööda teed taha maantee raiskavate jalgrattad salk. See on õigustatud, kui ehk intemperate eesmärk. See tõi välja jalgrattur, kes siis otsustasin teha isiklik anti-cager. Oma mitte põhjendamatu eeldada, et selline lähenemine on töötanud selle jalgrattur paljud korda enne, ehk kui nende hirmunud emad, noorte, eakate ja mitte-agressiivne. Siis, kui te näete keegi avalikult, oma tavaliselt ohutu eeldada, et see ei ole nende esimene kord nii hüper-agressiivne viisil toimides.
Kahjuks seekord reisija kutsus tema bluff. Oops! Teie alandlik Autor olid eest vastutav Metropolitan Police Id tsiteerivad juht kasti purustamiseks. Seejärel Id esitada tasud assault jalgrattur ja reisijate ja pakkumise langevad need kokku või üldse vastu. Mida sooviksite B & B?

Well, this is certainly an interesting situation. When an Audi A7 decided to snag some of the empty space in a bike box at a central London intersection, a couple of cyclists decided to give the driver of that Audi some forthright feedback. Naturally, the situation escalated.

The video is fairly easy to follow: cyclists get outraged, they chase down the Audi, they engage in typical Critical Mass behavior. This sort of stuff happens all the time in cities and your humble author is slightly abashed to admit that twenty years or so he was probably responsible for some of it himself, as a Super-class BMX racer who rode in a lot of cities alone and with groups of similar knuckleheads. When there are multiple cyclists involved, its bullying, plain and simple.
This time, however, the script was rewritten when a passenger hops out of the Audi and drills the offending (or offended, depending on your perspective) biker with a left hook. This significantly dampens the righteous ardor of said cyclist and he makes the proverbial right on red out of the situation. According to the Daily Mail, the London Metropolitan Police state they are ready to prosecute, but they have not been contacted by the cyclist.
Its at that point that my eyebrows raise a little bit here. Precisely what prosecution do they have in mind? Are they thinking that they would prosecute for the offense of entering the box? They have evidence for it now. Are they thinking they would prosecute the cyclist for harassing the passenger and/or driver? Surely, even in Cool Britannia one has the right to drive down the street without being screamed at in a threatening fashion by black-clad anonymous bikers. Sadly, I suspect its the actual punch for which theyd be willing to prosecute. Which makes the London Metropolitan Police no better at unraveling a crime/punishment situation than my fourth-grade Catholic-school teacher, who would frequently punish me for finishing a situation started by another student. I never got the knack of doing that stuff when her back was turned.
I have very little issue placing the blame for the confrontation on the cyclist. Yeah, the Audi driver was in the box. No, he wasnt impeding or threatening any bikers. To the contrary, he wanted to get around them and out of their way. He didnt want to drive down the road behind a clump of road-hogging bikes. This is a legitimate if perhaps intemperate goal. This brought out the anti-cager in a cyclist who then decided to make it personal. Its not unreasonable to suggest that this approach has worked for that cyclist many times before, perhaps when applied to frightened mothers, young people, the elderly, and the non-aggressive. Whenever you see someone acting in a hyper-aggressive manner in public, its usually safe to assume that this is not their first time doing so.
Unfortunately, this time the passenger called his bluff. Oops! Were your humble author in charge of the Metropolitan Police, Id cite the driver for breaking the box. Then Id file charges for assault against the cyclist and passenger and offer to drop them together or not at all. What would the B&B do?