The Anti-Monopoly Service wants to suspend the price of the auto service market in the closed market and is investigating several official dealers, car manufacturers and distributors on the facts of reselling the brandished spare parts at inflated prices, Mikhail Fedorenko, deputy head of the Federal Anti-Monopoly Service Control and Trade Control Department, said. Excavated prices for spare parts lead to an unjustified increase in the cost of maintenance of the vehicles under warranty. FÁS has received complaints from car owners, the high cost of the guarantee car and the car dealers. The latter unilaterally terminate the dealer's contracts, reduce the quotas for cars. Independent service centers, in turn, complain about the inability to buy original spare parts from the car maker. Thus, distributors (which are always closely related to the producers) monopolized the market of guarantee parts, and dealers-the market of the guarantee vehicles. FÁS is interested in the entire chain of relations: from the dealer-distributor-dealer to the car owners, because it is possible to create protected conditions for citizens only by analyzing the whole chain of interactions. The anti-monopolists want to force the automakers to open the guarantee market and the vehicles under warranty, and believe that producers should be able to accredit service centers with the necessary technical and personnel base, then the competition will be introduced and prices will decline. Market participants who have invested millions of dollars in the creation of authorized technical centres are meeting the FÁS initiative in the bayonet. After all, almost half of the dealer's profit comes to the service of the guarantee vehicles. But FÁS says that if market participants do not react and do not take adequate measures, the antitrust investigations and cases in this sphere will continue, and violators will be fined. Recently, the Federal Antimonopoly Service had proposed the establishment of a minimum standard of service for the automobile. Too often, in a more focused examination of the contract, the policyholder discovers that the main risks have not been closed.