Small, nimble, even in bright colours - new KIA-Picanto" and his fellow class brought a true celebration of the city streets.
Citroen C1, Suzuki Splash, Chevrolet Spark, Kia Picanto in Brownian streets, almost no one calls attention to our cars. Well, except for the new, the icon, the "KA-Picanto" sometimes evofies anyone's interest. Or someone's going to throw a curious look at the rare Chevy Spark. The rest of us are completely out of the crowd's attention. It's different when our column appeared on the streets of the provincial town. This is where the real excitement is, the luster in the eyes, the lenses to our side: toys on the road! But all the netherness of a relationship instantly ulcers, you barely know the typewriters. The rotors are 90-strong, full machine guns (exception-"Spark"), air-conditioners, and then the clematics, not to mention the routing computers. The kids aren't as bad as grownup cars. KOMPAKT-TODICKY A test was collected around "KIA-Pikanto"-a grown-up and loafted. Maybe even excessive.What's the point, for example, for the overheating of the helm? Given the size of the car, this glamorous thing in the winter, it is possible to outran the entire compact showroom. Nevertheless, the interior is generally good. The individuality of the style is complemented by the high quality of plastics, the rich equipment and functionality of the bezel and the dashboard. Ah, what a dead steering wheel! What equipment! In relation to the Pianto, like exclamations of exclamations of exclamations. Seat is a bit of a cunniless, but you are seated if not perfectly (the cushion of the pillow) is comfortable. The chair has a comfortable profile, it pleases the high landing, the large ranges of regulation. Yeah, and it's completely unexpected. Add a stylish, adjustable tilt to the list, an impressive 4-state machine selector, a well-performing climate systemThe only thing that can be criticized is the attitude towards the rear passengers: they are tightly knit, even in the lap, with the rough back of the front chair. "Suzuki Slash" in the background of KIA looks calmer. It has less bright spots, fanciful forms, and equipment does not affect riches. A natural "horse" with three cereals, single-tonic, boring plastic, no selectable selector. Only a huge speedometer is a tachometer, a rudimentary rosy from the centre of the front panel, though it somehow attracts the eye. In terms of style "splash" is a boring competitor. The tachometer is not about the bill. This is the most comfortable one. But if you look away from the outside impression, it turns out that "splash" is much better than the KIA. Seats at Suzuki are the most spacious and comfortable. There is also better overview, more inventive space for small thingsSitting in the second row will vote for "Suzuki" too: it is much more competitive in the back than in Pikanto. The "Sietroen" and "Chevrolet" are markedly different from the couple described above. And at the ideological level. At the normal level of equipment "Sietroen-C1" permeating the open simplicity of execution. The nakedness of the painted interior door panels, the absence of a normal glove compartment can be very frustrating at first meeting the car. Like the obvious problems with the rear passengers device. The Sietronena-C1 interiors are simple and completely original. But sitting behind the wheel at the "Sitroen" is convenient. And in general, despite the external scuffness, everything that is addressed to the driver is well thought out. In short, for one or two, what is needed is good visibility and perfectly felt dimensions. "Chevy-Spark" is trying to hold on to the fine line between the quality of performance and the bright design identityFor the first paragraph, there is a decent equipment and a common space in the salon. The second is a strange, if not to say, a combination of instruments, the interface of the climate unit, which is more annoying than happy, and plastic inserts into the color of the body, which clearly provide a cheap price. The Spark Salon looks very fresh. If it wasn't even for the plain-cheaply inserts in the body color. . In general, the attempt to single out here has been successful in three times, even if you don't talk about the convex seats from which you are constantly slipping. Seventy-four "horses" found under "Splash" first look like an unexpected winnings in a flash-point: a kind of grocery shopping-and here ... The prize for the turn was so, obviously not a jackpot. With the tail number 15 with the tail of the second, hundreds of "Suzuki" is not trying to claim record dynamics, although he is clearly a leader against the background of his rivalsBut behind the wheel of the splash, you don't have to be sad about lost seconds. It's just amazing to go. You pull, you brake, you turn the steering wheel, or you just move, you know, with a full understanding of the car. This good impression is created by the ease of response to the accelerator and the sensitive attitude of the machine to the wishes of the driver, that is, the rare harmony between the engine and the transmission. And when this cloth is complemented by good noise insulation and comfortable pendant, which confidently filter most of the road bumps, a very well-balanced machine is obtained-a convenient one in the city and even outside it. Of course, "splash" is not ideal. For example, on the serious wheels of his body, it starts to swing, preventing the driver from bucking the trajectory. But standing under the wheels to appear more or less flat asphalt, the car becomes quiet again, comfortable and very stable in behavior"KIA-Picanto" on clearly adapted to the Russian conditions of the pendant pimples, bouncing, smarter. It's a little bit simpler in the drive, though it's trying to make it look serious. In general, a solid furry. But the 1.2-litre engine on the background of "Japanese" does not have enough silencers (there are 'total' 85), if the automatic box is slightly "brakes," but periodically "Picanto" has to push the accelerator a bit. Otherwise, he loses the "Suzuki" pace. But the Picanto is more aggressive in the management. His stern pendants are not afraid of pits and pods, and they are done with them, even in the most insidious corners. Any asphalt of KIA is much more confident. However, we did not like the electric power steering: it is more difficult to feel the machine at high speed. On the whole, the KIA and Suzuki-wide swits are similar, but the superiority in the acoustic comfort is left behind "Splash". He's the best."Chevrolet" on the back of the competition was in the shade. Strangely, just a year ago, he was very successful against the Peu-107 and the Picanto of the past generation. Its engine (1.2 l, 82 litre) is not quite impressive in the background of the KIA and Suzuki units. As before, the park engine prefers high turnover, showing activity only after 3,500. But even with a manual gearbox, it can't keep the pace at the chosen pace, with a response to the gas pedal submerged in the floor. There is a way to go, but the constant stubbornness is still annoying. Not to mention the noise that after "Suzuki" and KIA began to appear to be catastrophic. Another weak spot "Spark" is a suspension set on smooth roads. The car is really comfortable. But there's a road to get a little bit worse, as the immediate uploading starts to tiring the crew.The most unpleasant thing is, "Spark", as the owner of a very sharp steering control, follows the hesitation of "dancing" on the road. In short, the car is typical of a typical city, without the right to leave the good highways. Even the "Sitroen" in the background of Spark is more remote in terms of manageability. At least, as long as his short oars cope with irregularities. But they are also under control of Chevrolet. And C1 with its modest liter of motor scooters and only 68 "horses" provoke to the back, porous. But how good can it be? The robot-robot is obviously not designed to accommodate the rapid driving temperament. In a quiet manner, she seems to be able to handle her duties. Although in this situation the machine is not always able to get to the city streamAnd on the "Sitroen" road, at least in automatic transmission mode, all the time must be pushed, constantly pushing the gas to the point. The list is not very clear, with a theatrical pause in brake application and mediocative soundproofing-in the end, we get a noisy, constantly vibrating car, which is not recommended for urban travel. COME ON, GIRL! The cars collected in the test are of course particularly interesting to the beautiful floor. We were asked to speak to an employee of our iPad, Milian Kolomiets, who has recently acquired rights and is on the Höndai-Getz. Miliana Kolomiets KIA-Picanto is one of the brightest cars of this class. Seating is convenient, and the handlebars are pleasant. But if you keep your hands on the steering wheel, your shoulders are tired. That's why I can't help putting my hands on the lower part of the baranka. To figure out what it's like to have a little girl, I'm moving in the chair a little lower, so the steering wheel closes the left side of the panel. It was like, "Pikanto" is a lot of windshield wipers. You don't have to run a brushes on the glass many times. There's plenty of room behind us, and the cushions are pretty tough, but you're still sitting like a Pioneer, almost vertical. Plus: provides for seat anchorages for a children's seat. Young mother, when choosing a car, it's very important. In the Pikanto, a trunk of an optimal size, just a little check on the top for some reason. There's no back shelf in the trunk, which means if there's fish in the shopping area, the salon could be gone. But the fifth door is comfortable. It closes easily, and the hands will remain clean in the oily weather. The main claim-to the brake pedal-it was too harsh, and it took a long time to get used to it. The left foot could have been bigger. Now, it's not convenient in any shoes. "Sitton-C1" is the highest score for the creativ! Immediately they threw themselves into the eyes of the air duct: their form is original and convenient. You can quickly customize your doublem by your desire. And the combination of instruments is interesting. It is good that it moves with the steering wheel: the wheel does not interfere with the face of the face. The back seat is good, there's enough room for two. That's the trunk of the melon. It's not enough to transport large bags. There's no handle on the back window of the fifth door, which means the hands will be dirty. Winter in our cities is not European. The load compartment at C1 is only 136 litres, but there is one thing to do. As in "Pianto", there is a small area for the foot's foot, and the movement of the foot searches for a place all the time. The main drawback is that there is no provision in the selector of a gearbox. It's time to remember the handbrake, or you risk coming out of the store, you can't find a car! Well, in the winter, the pans can even try on them, and then they'll have to pick them up. "Shetle-Spark" Sad to the salon, noted the good visibility ahead. It's probably the biggest windshield. But because of the shape of the back doors (the handles are high, and apparently because of this, they donated the island) to the car large dead zones. Therefore, the beginning owner will experience difficulties in parking and in reverse. On the way to work, it will be comfortable. The chair was close to the chair, with side support rolloins clearly fixed. And the shape of the door is convenient: there is a place to put your hand. About the same, but because the glass is too high, you feel a herring in the bank. The trunk is compatible, but it only opens from the salon or the key. Not the best option. I'll have to get the key every time. There's a small trunk in Chevy, but there's a full-sized spare in the bowels. Spark's got the toughest suspension. Besides, I can't get used to the foot pedal is a lot of weight. "Suzuki-Slash" The design of the car, as is the Shevrone-Spark is debatable. But it's a matter of taste and habit. I'm more important than looks. "splash" is the only car I sit in, not falling in the seat. He's the tallest one, and that's his advantage. And in the interior of everything, both in the front and back. For a trip to a business meeting, when you have to wear, say, heels, choose "Japanese." The pros are big enough to get out, not get out. The finish isn't very good. Plastic is cheaper than a competitor. The central console is no fancy. But this is the same: it is not overloaded, buttons, and circles as much as needed. The high floor of the trunk makes it easier to load things. You don't have to be tormented by loading heavy bags. "Slash" offers a rational cargo tank in 156 l-an identical boot to the rear of the KIA-Picanto. Splash is pretty cut out. The pedals are used to speed. Well, I finally found a decent foot for the leg! PLACE POSTEM ALONG THE "SARDS", "SARDS", "Pikanto", and other little ones, rarely meet even in the big cities, not to mention the province. They are the fate of young drivers or women's transport. The drivers of "real" cars think of them as a rule with condescending-scornful intonations. Of course, they look out for them, they look into it with interest. But what you love is a bigger machine, more universally, especially since these compact "toys" are not cheap at all. I am not going to tell anyone, but I want to draw attention to a clear trend: the non-serious typewriters, which remain compact and maneuverable, grow up with each new generation. "Suzuki Slash" in our test proved to be the most convenient and the most balanced, more like what we used to think of as a car. The small size in it is well-balanced with universality, and comfort in most situations is sufficient. But the "KA-Pikanto" is no worse than the "Japanese" on the head. I would venture to suggest that thanks to external data, it is KIA that in the near future will be on the ridge of women's attention. For this, Pikanto has all chances, including nature, excellent equipment and good fitness for Russian roads. I really want Schevet-Spark to reach out to the leaders, because his potential is not bad. But, to date, it must first be adapted to our conditions of exploitation. I guess that sounds paradoxical, but I would never change anything at the Sietroen. Let it remain as it is-savestee and selfish. That's his strength and charm. Unless the robot really wants to get rid of it. You get used to the rest, you adapt, you make it. And let the "Sietroen", he's "Peugeot 107", has a lot to criticize, he's always guaranteed a good mood charge! Sergei Voskresensky: " In my opinion, such machines should not be entirely rational. It is not practical for them to be of the greatest quality. They must be chosen for style and character. " COPPER EXPENDITURE FUEL 500 km " Citroen-C1.............................................................. 5.6 l/100 km "Suzuki-Slash".................... 5.9 l/100 km Chevrole-Spark................................... 6.2 l/100 km "Kia-Picanto"..................... 6.6 l/100 km of Citroen C1, Chevrolet Spark, Kia Picanto, Suzuki Splash, "Citroena-C1" is simple and completely original. The Spark Salon looks very fresh. If not yet frankly the cheap inserts into the color of the body. Ah, what a dead steering wheel! What equipment! In relation to the Pianto, like exclamations of exclamations of exclamations. In terms of style "splash" is a boring competitor. The tachometer is not about the bill. This is the most comfortable one. The simplicity of asceticism in C1 meets everywhere. But this reception is not annoying-he's part of the car's overall idea. The back electric windows, along with the clam, route computer and eye, are peculiarities of the most expensive Chevrolet. Picanto stands out as a variety of picks. The Suzuki driver's seat is the most spacious and comfortable. An option tachometer in C1 is a pillar of clueless, but it likes it. For originality and recognition, the highest score, but with the readability of instruments at Chevrolet, there are problems. In Pikanto, instruments are traditionally organized and seem trivial. But it's a good reading. In the strict "Suzuki" interiors, this device looks not only useless, but also superfluous. That's a speedometer! For a kid like "The Sietroen," what you need. Too exaggerating the coasters in Spark are openly interfering with the driver's leg. Pikanto has the most powerful version of the machine, with an engine of 1.2 l. The Suzuki Spidometer looks solid, but it has a lot of control bulbs in it. The creators of C1 appear to have decided to save on the weight of the glove compartment. The "Chevy" for the little things looks nice, but the lid lies straight on the knees. In addition to the unassuming glove box, Pianto has an ashtray and a cigarette lighter. "splash" in terms of the placement of trifles is off the competition. Rear seat C1 is the perfect place for the children to be punished. With the exception of a convex cushion and a low door opening, there are no claims in the second row "Spark". In "KAK-Picanto", sitting in the second row is quite comfortable. There's more doors than Spark. But the knees are on the hard backs of the front seats. Two passengers on the back sofa of Suzuki are placed with the greatest comfort. The load compartment at C1 is only 136 litres, but there is one thing to do. There's a small trunk in Chevy, but there's a full-sized spare in the bowels. In the Pikanto, a trunk of an optimal size, just a little check on the top for some reason. "Splash" offers a rational cargo bay in 156 l-identical boot of "KIA-Picanto". DANITAL PERFORMANTIC AND Elaticity, Braking, Braking RMEDIUM NOVA, BBA (ZD) EVALUATION OF ABTOMOBILE C1, Chevrolet Splatroen C1, Chevrolet SSplashCitroen C1, Chevrolet SSplashCitroen C1, Chevrolet SSplashCitroen C1, Chevrolet Spartak, Suzuki SplashCitroen C1, Chevrolett Spark, Kia Picanto, Suzuki SplashCitroen C1, Chevrolet Spark, Kia Picanto, Suzuki Splashmilian Kolomiets