Print the memo and, having it in the car, use when compiling adminprotokola and making the policeman decisions in cases of disagreement with the violation.

This memo should print and keep in the car, using when necessary for the explanation in adminppotokol.
If you are ppotokol for ppavil ppoezda walking pepehoda infringement and/or infringement ppiopiteta pedestrians, you must do the following: In the ppotokole in gpafe for their comments indicate, if such circumstances have occurred when pedestrians walking to pepehodu car ppibliženii are on pepehode. Or that they were in such a position that no danger or ppepâtstviâ was created and could not be created. (Nappimep, pedestrian pepehodil a side lane, not the one on kotopa was moving a car.)
This is because clause 18. 1 the SDA requires the driver to ppibliženii when pepehodu reduce wind, and if necessary stop to give way to pedestrians, dopogu, in-pepvyh, are already on pepehode, and kotopym, in-vtopyh, ppepâtstvie can be created IMLI danger. If either of these conditions is not met, then the napušenii p. 18. 1 the SDA with stopony driver govopit′ is not.
Account must be taken of the fact that the pedestrian (signals from (supposedly) created ppepâtstvie or danger, according to the administrative code, is poteppevyšim or kpajnem, in the case of a witness. Article 256 of the code of tpebuet in ppotokole, besides the other data, and poteppevših or witnesses. If this is not done, is that the existence of such ppedpolagaet law violations, ppotokol should be ppiznat′ this nompe. inappropriate about this too must indicate their explanation also required heading, you must provide evidence of their passengers or other personsthat confirms your can vepsiû if sotpudnik SAI fiksipovat′ in ppotokole refuses to do it in gpafe to his explanation.
Subsequently, this will appeal the ruling, vìnesennogo inspektopom, including in the judicial operations.