All people, as you know, are divided by type of perception of reality in General and cars in particular. For the auditory learner, it is important that in the car was quiet, and the motor is nice rustled, KINETICA appreciate the soft plastic and pleasant to the touch upholstery, and the visuals, which I am, important primarily design - internal and external.
We are continuing the long tests of the Chevrolet Spark with the participation of different drivers. As we travel, we will answer your questions. Ask questions, comment, suggest competitors to the machine under test. We are open to your suggestions. The disadvantages of a small Korean machine with a half-million price can be found without difficulty, and Spark has enough competitors, both in its class and among segments B's sedans, if you look at the price. Chevrolet Spark is a victory. According to the size of the Spark, it is quite enough, if you want to rear, you can put three colleagues and give them a lift to the metro. The holders of a large family are unlikely to ever pay attention to such a machine. The Chevrolet Spark1.2-litre engine is spinning in brisk and, having taken the high note, which after 4000 rpm has been accompanied by an extra light whistling, honestly gives out the promised 82 "horses". Not that too much, but for the city's pusher is enough, and travel outside of the ICA for the Spark-holder is unlikely to be regular. To make sure that these words are right, it is enough to look at the missing site for the left foot-it is time to put the "extra" limb out of the window. The electronic tachometer looks like a motorcycle, but it's not working so well. In order to keep the left leg in the passenger compartment, it can be taken on a regular basis, sometimes with the force of squeeze the pedal of the clutch. The exact transmission of the gearbox can be taken as a sample not only by Koreans, but also by the Germans from Opel-they have so precise "switch gear" has not been the case for a long time. In the Spark, it is pleasant to include reduced transmission with double clamp and transmission. No, I don't think you can do without retrograde, but it's nice to remember the youth that passed on the dead machines, on which without a double-clamp, it was impossible to turn on anything. And here, on such a whimsical looking car, double the joy of it, the more so that the engine with the puppy's delight and the squeal is gaining momentum even faster than it is to be able to show the electronic tachometer-though not a rudimism, but in this kind of obvious atavism. Three cards in the front door are good, but the top is where the arm should be. Spark doesn't want to be called a boring car, more like a fun and good-natuler car. It is not a technical choice, but now, after a week of active test drive, I cannot fail to admit that they are sufficient, both dynamic and in terms of the seat of the salon. In the first place, Spark is valuable for an interesting external and internal design with which the Koreans have clearly guessed. The River DuelChevrolet Spark vs Kia RioAs you requested, we made a face-to-face comparison of the Spark and Kia Rio. Formally, Rio belongs to a higher class, but it costs roughly like Spark, so machines can be compared, and we have chosen people with a large complement as a test tester. Next to the longer Rio sedan, they looked fine, but when the two richest people approached the park, we were scared, to tell the truth. Although the length of the Spark base is only 12.5 cm, the difference in length is already greater than 60 cm. Chevrolet Spark vs Kia Riovia space at the front, the difference between machines is minimal-driver growth 186 cm is placed behind the wheel, unless there is another "click" in Kia, and the seat is pushed back to the Spark seat. There are giants, too, and the difference in length is almost absent-the knees are in any case in the back of the front chair, with a slightly stronger difference in Rio. However, the width of the back sofa is Kia visibly winning-Spark two is barely shruppin shoulders, although if you select smaller passengers, then the three rear seats are still placed. The Chevrolet Spark vs Kia RioDynamic city measurements in urban areas showed almost total parity between competitors, formally Rio is a bit more powerful, but Spark is much easier, so the difference in dynamics is caught by the maneuverability of the machines, and here the Chevrolet is preferable. Rio is likely to be able to win back on the extra-urban highway, especially if the two machines are loaded-the larger engine should be easier to handle. Chevrolet Spark vs Kia RioM wanted to avoid comparing the design of Rio and Spark, but failed. The participants and spectators of the experiment, almost unanimously, including the Kia owner, voted for the Chevrolet Spark. He looked at both the rapid outer design and the interesting interior.